2 00 9 What does Newcomb ’ s paradox teach us ?
نویسندگان
چکیده
Newcomb's paradox highlights an apparent conflict involving the axioms of game theory. It concerns a game in which you choose to take either one or both of two closed boxes. However before you choose, a prediction algorithm deduces your choice, and fills the two boxes based on that deduction. The paradox is that game theory appears to provide two conflicting recommendations for what choice you should make in this situation. Here we analyze Newcomb's paradox using a recently introduced extension of game theory in which the players set conditional probability distributions in a Bayes net. Using this extended game theory, we show that the two game theory recommendations in Newcomb's scenario implicitly assume different Bayes nets relating the random variables of your choice and the algorithm's prediction. We resolve the paradox by proving that these two assumed Bayes nets are incompatible, i.e., the associated assumptions conflict. In doing this we show that the accuracy of the algorithm's prediction, which was the focus of much previous work on Newcomb's paradox, is irrelevant. We also show that Newcomb's paradox is time-reversal invariant; both the paradox and its resolution are unchanged if the algorithm makes its " prediction " after you make your choice rather than before.
منابع مشابه
What does Newcomb's paradox teach us?
In Newcomb’s paradox you choose to receive either the contents of a particular closed box, or the contents of both that closed box and another one. Before you choose, a prediction algorithm deduces your choice, and fills the two boxes based on that deduction. Newcomb’s paradox is that game theory appears to provide two conflicting recommendations for what choice you should make in this scenario...
متن کاملTemporal Vagueness, Coordination and Communication
How is it that people manage to communicate even when they implicitly differ on the meaning of the terms they use? Take an innocent-sounding expression such as tomorrow morning. What counts as morning? There is a surprising amount of variation across different people.1 For Anna, morning starts ‘when she gets up’, and finishes ‘when she has lunch’. For Bart (who verges on the pedantic), morning ...
متن کاملar X iv : h ep - p h / 04 11 19 1 v 1 1 5 N ov 2 00 4 POLARIZED STRUCTURE FUNCTIONS AND THE GDH INTEGRAL FROM LATTICE QCD
The Gerasimov-Drell-Hearn integral I GDH (Q 2), and its relation to polarized nu-cleon structure functions, is discussed from the lattice perspective. Of particular interest is the variation of I GDH (Q 2) with Q 2 , and what it may teach us about the origin and magnitude of higher-twist contributions.
متن کامل2 00 9 Fermi ’ s Paradox – The Last Challenge for Copernicanism ?
We review Fermi’s paradox (or the ”Great Silence” problem), not only arguably the oldest and crucial problem for the Search for ExtraTerrestrial Intelligence (SETI), but also a conundrum of profound scientific, philosophical and cultural importance. By a simple analysis of observation selection effects, the correct resolution of Fermi’s paradox is certain to tell us something about the future o...
متن کامل